Towards understanding the differences between reading on paper and screen: measuring attention changes in brain activity

Arūnas Gudinavičius


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15291/libellarium.v9i1.240

Abstract


Non-intrusive experimentation and measurements can be obtained from the latest neuroscience scanning techniques and technologies. Such technologies are now quite affordable and could possibly be used for the reading process research in information and communication sciences. The research experiment focuses on measuring the changes in attention while reading the text on different media (devices). The pilot experiment showed that cheap and easy to use brainwave measuring devices can be used for testing reading processes by measuring attention (concentration). The results revealed that a reading medium (device) affects the level of attention and suggested that less attention is needed to read from paper compared to any size or type of screen. Reading books (in a foreign language) can mostly be considered neutral on the attention level scale (slightly shifted towards 53 on a 1-100 scale).

Keywords


reading; paper vs screen; attention; brain activity

Full Text:

HTML PDF

References


Chu, Christina A., Mark Rosenfield, and Joan K. Portello. 2014. "Blink patterns: reading from a computer screen versus hard copy." Optometry & Vision Science 91, 3: 297-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000157

Chu, Christina A.; Mark Rosenfield, Joan K. Portello, Jaclyn A. Benzoni, and Juanita D. Collier. 2011. "A comparison of symptoms after viewing text on a computer screen and hardcopy." Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 31, 1: 29-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00802.x

Johnstone, S., R. Blackman, and J. Bruggemann. 2012. "EEG from a single channel dry sensor recording device." Clinical EEG and Neuroscience 43, 2: 112-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1550059411435857

Rebolledo-Mendez, Genaro, Ian Dunwell, Erika A. Martínez-Mirón, María Dolores Vargas-Cerdán, Sara Freitas, Fotis Liarokapis, and Alma R García-Gaona. 2009. "Assessing NeuroSky's Usability to Detect Attention Levels in an Assessment Exercise." Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Part I: New Trends, July 19-24, 2009, San Diego, CA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02574-7_17

Rogers, Jeffrey M., Stuart J. Johnstone, Anna Aminova, James Donnellyc, and Peter H. Wilson. 2016. "Test-retest reliability of a single-channel, wireless EEG system." International Journal of Psychophysiology 106: 87–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.06.006

Sharmin, Selina, Oleg Špakov, and Kari-Jouko Räihä. 2012. "The effect of different text presentation formats on eye movement metrics in reading." Journal of Eye Movement Research 5, 3: 1-9. http://www.jemr.org/download/pictures/d4/7ufz0au8cp2ae9jyjnymwi30z7obe6/sharmin_jemr_2012_revised1.pdf

Sturges, Paul. 2014. "The brain at the centre of the information universe: lessons from popular neuroscience." Libellarium: Journal for the Research of Writing, Books, and Cultural Heritage Institutions 7, 1: 3-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15291/libellarium.v7i1.193

Taipale, Sakari. 2014. "The affordances of reading/writing on paper and digitally in Finland." Telematics and Informatics 31, 4: 532-542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2013.11.003

Zambarbieri, Daniela, and Elena Carniglia. 2012. "Eye movement analysis of reading from computer displays, eReaders and printed books." Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 32, 390–396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00930.x




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15291/libellarium.v9i1.240

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
X




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Libellarium (Online). ISSN 1846-9213 © 2008

ERIH PLUS
doaj.png



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.