Do we need better online book review organisation?

Tjaša Jug, Maja Žumer


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15291/libellarium.v9i2.268

Abstract


Introduction. Online customer reviews present one of the most important factors in book purchasing or borrowing decisions. Given that only well-organized reviews are useful, Amazon has already started linking multiple formats and editions of the same book. Nevertheless, this method is not suitable for books that have appeared in many formats and editions as some attributes do not apply to all versions.

Research questions. In our study we were interested in the aspects of a book users perceive as important and the extent to which these attributes match FRBR entities. We were also interested in the relation between specific attributes in the reviews and the numeric rating of the book.

Methods. We used content analysis on two random samples of Amazon customer reviews. The sample included a total of 600 reviews of three well-known fiction book titles that have many formats and editions that accommodate the different preferences of readers.

Results. The results show that readers take into consideration book information at various abstraction levels that match those in the FRBR model. Most reviewers comment on the book content while review readers consider reviews that comment on different aspects of a book as more helpful.

Conclusions. Given that subjective opinion is an important factor in the users’ book selection decision, it would be reasonable to rethink the presentation and organisation of online book reviews.

Keywords


customer reviews; Amazon; FRBR; content analysis

Full Text:

PDF EPUB HTML

References


Arndt, Johan. 1967. "Role of product-related conversations in the diffusion of a new product". Journal of Marketing Research 4, 3: 291–295. https://doi.org/10.2307/3149462

Bae, Soonyong, and Taesik Lee. 2011. "Product type and consumers' perception of online consumer reviews." Electronic Markets 21, 4: 255-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-011-0072-0

Carr, Paul. 2010. "Amazon: You need to change your idiotic customer reviews policy right now." Accessed January 28, 2016. http://techcrunch.com/2010/03/22/im-not-kidding-do-it-now/.

Chen, Pei-Yu, Samita Dhanasobhon, and Michael D. Smith. 2008. "All reviews are not created equal: The disaggregate impact of reviews and reviewers at Amazon." Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University. Accessed May 6, 2016. http://repository.cmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1054%26context=heinzworks

Chevalier, Judith A., and Mayzlin Dina. 2006. "The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews." Journal of marketing research 43, 3: 345-354. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345

Fowler, Geoffrey A., and Joseph D Avila. 2009. "On the Internet, everyone's a critic but they're not very critical." Wall Street Journal. Accessed May 6, 2016. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB125470172872063071

Freedman, Lauren. 2008. "Merchant and customer perspectives on customer reviews and user-generated content." Accessed May 25, 2016. http://www.e-tailing.com/content/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/2008_WhitePaper_0204_4FINAL-powerreviews.pdf

Functional requirements for bibliographic records: final report. 1998. Munich: K.G. Saur.

Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten and Gianfranco Walsh. 2003. "Electronic word-of-mouth: Motives for and consequences of reading customer articulations on the Internet." International Journal of Electronic Commerce 8, 2: 51-74.

Huang, Kuei Yun, and Wen I Yang. 2010. "A study of internet book reviews and borrowing intention." Library Review 59, 7: 512-521. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242531011065109

Huang, Liqiang, Tan Chuan-Hoo, Ke Weiling, and Kwok-Kee Wei. 2014. "Do we order product review information display? How?" Information %26 Management 51, 7: 883-894.

Huang, Peng, Nicholas H. Lurie, and Sabyasachi Mitra. 2009. "Searching for experience on the web: an empirical examination of consumer behavior for search and experience goods." Journal of Marketing 73, 2: 55-69. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.2.55

Kakali, Constantia. 2014. "A utilization model of users' metadata in libraries." The Journal of Academic Librarianship 40, 6: 565-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.08.004

Klein, Lisa R. 1998. "Evaluating the potential of interactive media through a new lens: Search versus experience goods." Journal of business research 41, 3: 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(97)00062-3

Lin, Tom M. Y., Yun Kuei Huang, and Wen I. Yang, 2007. "An experimental design approach to investigating the relationship between Internet book reviews and purchase intention." Library %26 Information Science Research 29, 3: 397-415.

Liu, Qianqian Ben, Elena Karahanna, and Richard T. Watson. 2011. "Unveiling user-generated content: Designing websites to best present customer reviews." Business Horizons 54, 3: 231-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.004

Mikkonen, Anna, and Pertti Vakkari. 2012. "Readers' search strategies for accessing books in public libraries." In Proceedings of the 4th Information Interaction in Context Symposium, New York, August 21 – 24, 2012, 214-233. New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2362724.2362760

Mudambi, Susan M., and David Schuff. 2010. "What makes a helpful review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon. com." MIS quarterly 34, 1: 185-200.

Mudambi, Susan M., David Schuff, and Zhewei Zhang. 2010. "Why aren't the stars aligned? An analysis of online review content and star ratings." In Proceedings of the Forty-Seventh Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, 6-9 January 2014. IEEE.

Nakayama, Makoto, Norma Sutcliffe, and Yun Wan. 2010. "Has the web transformed experience goods into search goods?" Electronic Markets 20, 3-4: 251-262.

Nelson, Phillip. 1970. "Information and consumer behavior." Journal of political economy 78, 2: 311-329. https://doi.org/10.1086/259630

Nelson, Phillip. 1974. "Advertising as information." Journal of political economy 82, 4: 729-754. https://doi.org/10.1086/260231

Nielsen. 2015. Global Trust in advertising: Winning strategies for an evolving media landscape. Accessed January 28, 2016. http://www.nielsen.com/content/dam/nielsenglobal/apac/docs/reports/2015/nielsen-global-trust-in-advertising-report-september-2015.pdf.

Pecoskie, Jen, Louise F. Spiteri, and Laurel Tarulli. 2014. "OPACs, users, and readers' advisory: Exploring the implications of user-generated content for readers' advisory in Canadian public libraries." Cataloging %26 Classification Quarterly 52, 4: 431-453.

Pöntinen, Janna, and Pertti Vakkari. 2013. "Selecting fiction in library catalogs: A gaze tracking study." In Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, TPDL 2013, Valletta, Malta, September 22-26. Proceedings 72-83. Heidelberg: Springer.

Švab, Katarina, Tanja Merčun, and Maja Žumer. 2014. "Researching bibliographic data with users: examples of 5 qualitative studies." In Libraries in the Digital Age (LIDA) Proceedings, Zadar, June 13, 2014. Accessed January 28, 2016. http://ozk.unizd.hr/proceedings/index.php/lida/article/view/118/121.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15291/libellarium.v9i2.268

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
X




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Libellarium (Online). ISSN 1846-9213 © 2008

ERIH PLUS
doaj.png



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.