The gap between users and cataloguers: perception of importance of bibliographic data for required reading and leisure reading
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15291/libellarium.v1i1.322
Abstract
Keywords
References
Aalberg, Trond, and Žumer, Maja. 2013. “The value of MARC data, or, challenges of frbrisation.” Journal of Documentation, no. 6: 851-72.
Applegate, Rachel. 2008. “Whose decline? Which academic libraries are" deserted" in terms of reference transactions?. “Reference & User Services Quarterly 48, no. 2: 176-189.
Boydston, Jeanne. M. K., and Leysen, Joan M. 2006. “Observations on the Catalogers' Role in Descriptive Metadata Creation in Academic Libraries.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 43, no. 2: 3-17.
Calhoun, Karen, Cantrell, Joanne, Gallagher, Peggy, and Janet Hawk. 2009. Online Catalogs: What Users and Librarians Want: An OCLC Report. Dublin, OH: OCLC Online Computer Library Center.
Calhoun, Karen. 2006. “The Changing Nature of the Catalog and its Integration with Other Discovery Tools (Final Report)”. Accessed May 3, 2018. http://www.loc.gov/ catdir/calhoun-report-final.pdf.
Chercourt, Mina, and Lauren Marshall. 2013. “Making keywords work: Connecting patrons to resources through enhanced bibliographic records.” Technical Services Quarterly 30, no. 3: 285-295.
Christensen, Anne. 2013. “Next-generation catalogues: what do users think?.” In Catalogue 2.0: The Future of the Library Catalogue, edited by Sally Chambers, 1-15. London: Facet Publishing.
Diao, Junli, and Hernández, Mirtha A. 2014. “Transferring Cataloging Legacies into Descriptive Metadata Creation in Digital Projects: Catalogers’ Perspective.” Journal of Library Metadata 14, no. 2: 130-45.
Dinkins, Debbi, and Kirkland, Laura N. 2006. “It’s what’s inside that counts: adding contents notes to bibliographic records and its impact on circulation.” College & Undergraduate Libraries, 13(1), 59–71.
Goodall, Deborah. 1989. Browsing in public libraries. Loughborough: Library and Information Statistics Unit.
Hider, Philip, and Tan, Kah-Ching. 2008. “Constructing Record Quality Measures Based on Catalog Use.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 46, no. 4: 338-361.
Hider, Philip. 2008. “Catalogue use at the State Library of Victoria.” Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 39, no. 1: 14-25.
Hypén, Kaisa. 2014. “Kirjasampo: Rethinking metadata.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 52, no. 2: 156-80.
Kalan, Pavle. 1967. Abecedni imenski katalog. Ljubljana: Društvo bibliotekarjev Slovenije ter Narodna in univerzitetna knjižnica.
Kanič, Alenka. 2014. “Cataloguing Rules and their Changes - current situation in Slovenia,” Organizacija znanja, no. 2: 49-53.
Lewandowski, Dirk. 2010. “Using Search Engine Technology to Improve Library Catalogs.” In Advances in Librarianship, edited by Anne Woodsworth, 35-54. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Merčun, Tanja. 2014. “Čas za spremembe: prihodnost knjižničnega kataloga.” Šolska knjižnica 24, no. 3-4: 144-155.
Mi, Jia, and Weng, Cathy. 2008. “Revitalizing the Library OPAC: Interface, Searching, and Display Challenges.” Information Technology & Libraries 27, no.1: 5-22.
Mikkonen, Anna, and Vakkari, Pertti. 2012. “Readers' search strategies for accessing books in public libraries.” In Proceedings of the 4th IIIX Symposium, 214-33. New York: ACM.
Novotny, Eric. 2004. “I don’t think I click: a protocol analysis study of use of a library online catalog in the internet age,” College and Research Libraries, no. 6: 532.
Petrucciani, Alberto. 2015. “Quality of Library Catalogs and Value of (Good) Catalogs.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 53, no. 3-4: 303-313.
Prekat: pravilnik za enostavno uporabo katalogizacijskih pravil. 2001. Ljubljana: NUK.
Riva, Pat, Le Boeuf, Patrick, and Žumer, Maja. 2017. IFLA Library Reference Model: A Conceptual Model for Bibliographic Information. Haag: IFLA.
Rose, Mary Z. 2012. “The Ship Has Sailed and We Aren't On It: How Catalogers Could Support User Tasks and Why We Won’t.” Journal of Library Metadata, no: 2-3: 128.
Snow, Karen. 2017. “Defining, Assessing, and Rethinking Quality Cataloging.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 55, no. 7-8: 438-55.
Spiteri, Louise F. 2009. “The impact of social cataloguing sites on the construction of bibliographic records in the public library catalogue.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 47, no. 1: 52-73.
Strader, Rockelle C. 2017. “From User Tasks to User Services: Placing the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records Models Into a Larger Framework.” Technical Services Quarterly, no. 4: 347-368.
Švab, Katarina, and Žumer, Maja. 2016. “Izbira leposlovja–še vedno izziv za knjižnice?: kriteriji, ki so pomembni za uporabnike / Selection of fiction-still a challenge for libraries?: important criteria for users.” Knjižnica 60 (2-3): 127-149.
Tosaka, Yuji, and Weng, Cathy. 2011. “Reexamining content-enriched access: Its effect on usage and discovery.” College & Research Libraries 72, no. 5: 412-427.
Verona, Eva. 1983. Pravilnik i priručnik za izradbu abecednih kataloga. Dio 2, Kataložni opis. Zagreb: Hrvatsko bibliotekarsko društvo.
Verona, Eva. 1986. Pravilnik i priručnik za izradbu abecednih kataloga. Dio 1, Odrednice i redalice (2. izmijenjeno izd.). Zagreb: Hrvatsko bibliotekarsko društvo.
Xiaojuan, Zhai, and Na, Nie. 2012. “The Gap between Users and Cataloging - Description and Analysis of Survey Data in Chinese Academic Library.” Accessed January 7, 2018. https://www.ifla.org/past-wlic/2012/80-zhai-en.pdf.
Yee, Martha. 2006. “Beyond the OPAC: Future Directions For Web-Based Catalogues”. Accessed May 3, 2018. https://www.nla.gov.au/acoc/beyond-the-opac-future-directions-for-web-based-catalogues.
ZNAČKA: priročnik za določanje značnic pri katalogizaciji. 2001. Ljubljana: Narodna in univerzitetna knjižnica.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15291/libellarium.v1i1.322
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Libellarium (Online). ISSN 1846-9213 © 2008
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |